The effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion is that It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for its actions. Option C
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?</h3>
Generally, If the Office's findings, conclusions, or recommendations have any legal implications, they must be handled by a Legal Expert, who may be an Advisor, Associate Advisor, Consultant, or another official with relevant credentials and expertise in the law.
In conclusion, By having legal experts on the panel, the interviewer is able to demonstrate how the system avoids accountability. C as a viable alternative
Read more about legal experts
brainly.com/question/1346208
#SPJ1
CQ
What is the effect of the interviewer including legal experts in the panel discussion?
A. It discredits the impact of the Gault case on the juvenile justice system.
B. It reveals the positive changes to the system that the public ignores.
C. It exposes how the system does not take responsibility for their actions.
D. It offers insight into the state of the juvenile justice system.
The action being shown in the scenario given above is called
political patronage. This is a reward given to an individual when they were
able to obtain a prestige or benefits when the individual has served or given a
favor to an official and because of that, they are likely to be offered with a
reward.
Memory
is for storing information about the past “memory helps us preserve
past events” and variations on that theme.
Answer:
The fourth amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.
Explanation:
In other words, the police cannot enter a home and collect evidence for a crime unless they obtain a search warrant, or a reason to search the home.
