Available Options Are:
a. Cost of Goods Sold
b. Net Profit Margin
c. None of these
d. Asset Turnover
Answer:
Option B. Net Profit Margin
Explanation:
The increase or decrease in cost of Goods sold can not tell whether the return on assets has increased or decreased becuase it would only tell that the expense are decreased or increased not the profit. Which means it only tells one side of the story hence Option A is incorrect.
Option B is correct because it talks about the profit. If the manufacturing cost has been decreased then the it must increase the profit. Because if the profits has increased then the return on asset will increase. Hence the Option B is correct here.
Option D is incorrect because asset turnover formula is:
Asset Turnover = Sales / Total Assets
The decrease in manufacturing cost will not increase the sales because sales and total assets are independent of manufacturing expenses hence the Option D is incorrect.
Answer:
when u have 2 decide between 1 and another or when u r taking a test then u have make a decision
Explanation:
Every indexed stock choice agreement offers the holder the right to buy or promote a hundred shares of stock.
A share is a piece of the agency an investor can personalize. A proportion is a unit of ownership (e.g., you very own 10 shares), whereas inventory is a measurement of fairness (e.g., you personal 10% of the agency). think of stocks as a small portion of an enterprise.
Definition: 'stock' represents the holder's part-possession in a single or several groups. in the meantime, 'percentage' refers to an unmarried unit of possession in a corporation. as example, if X has invested in stocks, it is able to imply that X has a portfolio of shares across special companies.
Shares are gadgets of fair ownership in an organization. For some companies, shares exist as an economic asset providing for an identical distribution of any residual earnings, if any are declared, in the form of dividends.
Learn more about Shares here: brainly.com/question/25818989
#SPJ4
Answer:
Paul Hyatt is fully liable for all business debts
Explanation:
Unlimited liability in this scenario, means that Paul Hyatt is fully liable for all business debts. That is because unlimited liability is defined as the full legal responsibility that business owners and partners assume for all business debts, and since Paul Hyatt is a sole proprietor which means that he both owns and runs DeepCleans and there is no legal distinction between him and the business entity, then he is fully liable for debts and profits of DeepClean.
Answer:
"No" would be the correct choice.
Explanation:
- The documentation could not be issued to him whenever their Amy is indeed not Mr. Mitchel's legal offspring attributable to some other individual's custody. They cannot compensate for the demand as well as text.
- Whether there is some doubt about either the approved note's authenticity, seek to contact the individual by contacting himself, either correlate signs on organizational documents.
