What is 3498 divided by 7.Explain how you got this answer and why you think its reasonable
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Option (3).
Step-by-step explanation:
Option (1).
3(x - 1) = x + 2(x + 1) + 1
3x - 3 = x + 2x + 2 + 1
3x - 3 = 3x + 3 [Not True]
Therefore, this equation is not an identity.
Option (2).
x - 4(x + 1) = -3(x + 1) + 1
x - 4x - 4 = -3x - 3 + 1
-3x - 4 = -3x - 2 [Not true]
Therefore, this equation is not an identity.
Option (3).
2x + 3 =
2x + 3 = 2x + 1 + 2
2x + 3 = 2x + 3 [True]
Therefore, this equation is an identity.
Option (4).
3x - 1.5 = 3x + 3 - x - 2
3x - 1.5 = 2x + 1 [Not true]
Therefore, this equation is not an identity.
Answer:
1) B. The differences are normally distributed or the sample size is large
C. The sample size mus be large
E. The sampling method results in an independent sample
2) The null hypothesis H₀: =
The alternative hypothesis Hₐ: <
Test statistic, t = -0.00693
p- value = 0.498
Do not reject Upper H₀ because, the P-value is greater than the level of significance. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that sons are the same height as their fathers at 0.10 level of significance
Step-by-step explanation:
1) B. The differences are normally distributed or the sample size is large
C. The sample size mus be large
E. The sampling method results in an independent sample
2) The null hypothesis H₀: =
The alternative hypothesis Hₐ: <
The test statistic for t test is;
The mean
Height of Father, h₁, Height of Son h₂
72.4, 77.5
70.6, 74.1
73.1, 75.6
69.9, 71.7
69.4, 70.5
69.4, 69.9
68.1, 68.2
68.9, 68.2
70.5, 69.3
69.4, 67.7
69.5, 67
67.2, 63.7
70.4, 65.5
= 69.6
s₁ = 1.58
= 69.9
s₂ = 3.97
n₁ = 13
n₂ = 13
(We reversed the values in the square root of the denominator therefore, the sign reversal)
t = -0.00693
p- value = 0.498 by graphing calculator function
P-value > α Therefore, we do not reject the null hypothesis
Do not reject Upper H₀ because, the P-value is greater than the level of significance. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that sons are the same height as their fathers at 0.10 lvel of significance