Because they owned every step of the process to make steel like for example they owned the mines to mine the iron. Then they would own a 2nd mine to mine the coal for the steel. Then they would own the factories to make the steal. That is a vertical monopoly so for shorting your answer you can say they owned the mines and the factories to make the steel.
Yeah sadly then I run out of points for the day so if y’all could please like this it would be wonderful
Answer:
- Taste new foods
- Spread of Ideas and Inventions
- Access to exotic goods
- Become wealthy
- Economy of a country grows
- Export items you have a surplus of
- Explore new places = Adventure of a lifetime
Explanation:
The Silk Road connected multiple nations and empires that enabled them to trade with one another. This allowed for new food to be spread as well as for ideas and inventions as well.
Exotic goods from other nations became readily available and traders had the opportunity to become wealthy. With trade and the opportunities that came with it, the economies of countries grew and the were able to export items they had a surplus of.
For adventurers, the silk road gave them access to new areas to go on adventures in and have the journeys of a lifetime.
Answer
Appeal to a higher federal court.
Explanation
The trial process. Listen. At the trial, the accused may be tried by judge alone or by judge and jury. The purpose of the trial is to present all relevant admissible evidence to the court. The jury will decide the guilt or innocence of the accused person. In the trial courts, the lawyers present evidence and legal arguments to persuade the jury in a jury trial or the judge in a bench trial. After the party loses in the trial court or it is not contented with the ruling one can appeal to the Us supreme court. The appellant or the party who files an appeal must show that the trial court made a legal error that affected the decision in the case.The appellant prepares a written document, or brief, discussing the legal arguments. In this process, appellants cite previous court cases that support their point of view.
Answer:
Everything would fall into peices and there would be absolute confusion
Explanation:
this is because nobody has a real means of where to go and what to do, because nobody would be leading.
