<span>"The pathogens from infected cattle are spread not only in feedlots, but also at slaughterhouses and hamburger grinders. The slaughterhouse tasks most likely to contaminate meat are the removal of an animal's hide and the removal of its digestive system. The hides are now pulled off by machine; if a hide has been inadequately cleaned, chunks of dirt and manure may fall from it onto the meat. Stomachs and intestines are still pulled out of cattle by hand; if the job is not performed carefully, the contents of the digestive system may spill everywhere." From improperly cleaned animal hides, and improperly digested foods contaminated with harmful bacteria.</span>
Answer:
I will dscuss this onn this 3 points:
1. Confederation war
2. Secession from the south
3. Slavery
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of USA, was among the most respected presidents to have ruled the con federal state of USA. He ruled from 1861 until his assassination in 1865.
His victory at the poll was greeted with secession drive by the southern sates, whose major purpose of the secession demand was the fear of abolition of slave trade. He assured the Southern secessionists of his unwillingness to abolish slaver across America but supported law that will limit them within their immediate territories. Fall out from the agitation was the American civil war fought between the North and the South.
However, in his second term he signed the amendment to abolish slave trade in the United States. The abolition and the emancipation of slaves was later regarded as the goal of the Union war
After his ingratiation he was grappled with the civil war. There were demands from the states of the south for secession. He took permission from the congress to suspend the constitution in other to have upper hand to suppress the secession sympathizers from South. His second victory at polls gave him opportunity to further unite the union. He was later regarded as the saviour of the union.
They got eaten or died cuz the lake was too cold
The question above is one of about the psychology of trust.
According to psychologists, people who find it hard to trust others usually themselves can't be trusted.
Some of the signs that a person has trust issues are:
- they make people seem like they are capable of exhibiting the very action that they are capable of: This entails accusing others of behaviors that they themselves are exhibiting or thinking of carrying out;
- They breach confidentiality: It is easy to see from the comment that the person speaking is most likely prone to breach confidentiality. If a person has refused to help another, the question is, how is that related to whether or not they are trustworthy?
So a person who is more likely to say that you can't trust another person may themselves be unworthy of trust.
Read more about Trust here:
brainly.com/question/6014670