Answer:
Miguel cabrera
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that :
Miguel cabrera's batting average = 0.33
Mike trout's batting average = 0.326
The average for both players was obtained during the same season:
Hence. Comparing their respective averages,
0.33 = 0.330
0.330 > 0.326
Hence, Miguel Cabrera's batting average is higher than that of Mike trout
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
To be a function each x can only go to one y
The number 5 goes to both 2 and 1, which violates the rule
Therefore, this is a relation, not a function
I don’t know is the answer 40
Answer:
d. a f
Step-by-step explanation:
i hope this helps :)
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation