Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Lars is completing a history project about World War I. On the British government's National Archives website, he finds letters from American soldiers as well as documents written by museum curators and historians that give background information about the war, supported by primary sources from their archives' collections.
Which descriptions best characterize this information? Select three options.
a. outdated facts, b. credible sources, c. primary sources, d. biased information
, e. reasoned judgment
Answer:
b. credible sources
c. primary sources
e. reasoned judgment
Explanation:
Primary sources are documents that were made and built at the time the historic event they document is taking place. In that case, they can claim that the letters that American soldiers wrote during the First World War are a primary source.
A credible source is one that is written by an expert on a given subject, in addition, these sources have evidence that supports all the statements they present. When Lars uses historical sources written by curators and historians who used primary sources as evidence, he is using credible feints.
After doing this research, Lars will be able to draw conclusions about the first world war using these sources as evidence, thus making an easoned judgment.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Sorry I guessed I didnt think you would see this so, here the real answer!
It is "<span>Dissonance was placed on the "weak" beat."
</span>
This question is a bit silly but I think it would be an African American single parent.
Answer:
C. It encouraged to challenge British laws.
Explanation:
The impact of John Locke's views of natural law on the Founding Father's was that it encouraged to challenge British laws because he was an English physician and philosopher, and as such was referred to as the father of liberalism.
John Locke's work was significant in the drafting of "The Fundamental constitution of Carolina."
