True expl.For many years, it has been generally accepted that standards control access to markets. Consider, for example, the following statements. “The technology standard has become the source of a core competitive edge for industrial development. To some extent, a technology standard is a kind of development order and rule. Whoever controls the power of standard making and has its technology as the leading standard, commands the initiative of the market. Technology standards have become an important means of global economic competition, and directly influence the competitiveness of an industry, region or country. Therefore, as for Chinese enterprises, possessing the successful standard is a strategic choice to seize the leadership of the future industrial development.”
The possible reasons for the changes observed in the survey of 2002 are:
Killing oneself.
Drug abuse.
Psychosis.
What is a survey?
In this type of study, a group of individuals are the subjects, and a set of questions is used to elicit specific data from them.
Youth risk behavior changed as a result of the high rate of early deaths, many of which might be attributed to occurrences of self-immolation.
As the youth became involved in substance and drug misuse, there was a rise in health issues and quick behavioral changes.
Many others who had no health problems or fatalities as a result of the stress and abuse caused by these relapsed into psychosis, an abnormal mental condition that makes it impossible to distinguish between what is real and what is not.
Therefore, psychosis, self-immolation, and drug misuse are the modifications that the survey from 2002 has found.
Learn more about behavioral brainly.com/question/27683109
#SPJ9
Segregation was unconstitutional.
The answer is: B. United Nations.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.