Many reasons... First of all they should not have involved the United States of America, even Hitler knew that to win a war, you don't involve the Americans, you can even find quotes of Hitler talking about that. Even the Admiral in charge of the attack on Pearl Harbor knew it was a horrible idea "I can run wild for six months … after that, I have no expectation of success".
Other than involving the Americans, the Japanese should've attack up into the USSR (Russia) opening up a new front and forcing the Russians to move man power to their east.
Another is that Japan often ignored their German allies when they advised against certain campaigns and attacks, which were strategically horrid ideas.
Also, nukes.
Answer:
Most likely the second choice.
Explanation:
Madison:
Refused to honor an appointment
Marbury :
Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789
Argued for original jurisdiction
Was appointed as a federal judge
1. I think they wanted to find the same conditions as they had before. Germans were farmers, so they were looking for the land for farming, Portuguese were fishermen so they were looking for coast to continue fishing.
2. As far as I remember a major goal <span>of the Erie Canal project </span>was to link Lake Erie and the other Great Lakes with the Atlantic.
3. I'm pretty sure that Erie Canal gave people an opportunity to use boats to deliver cargo and gave New York access to raw materials. And these goods were delievered to the East.
4. They knew that it's a useful experience to find out how the British canal system was built. I think they should ask something about what location to choose, about the benefits of different geography and climate.