Answer:
FOIL: 
(3x + 5y)(3x+5y)
F: 3x*3x
O: 3x*5y
I: 5y*3x
L: 5y*5y

Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Here-
Equation at the end of step 1 :
((9 • (x2)) - 4xy) - 2y2 Step 2 :
Equation at the end of step 2 :
(32x2 - 4xy) - 2y2Step 3 :
Trying to factor a multi variable polynomial :
3.1 Factoring 9x2 - 4xy - 2y2
Final result :
9x2 - 4xy - 2y2
The answer is C.2 I’m pretty sure