Agricultural Technology developed alongside the farming and agricultural industry- hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Emperor Ashoka. Indian emperor who controlled over 3 million Sq Km. He was responsible for the spread of Buddhism outside the borders of India
Do you have options I can choose from?
Answer:
C. American Indians became hardier and fought off Spanish rule.
Explanation:
A. is not the correct answer. Spanish did not feel exhausted as they could easily replace the armies or continue after the break from the mission.
B. is not correct. Foreign parties did not raid the Spanish during their missions.
<u>C. is the correct answer. While Spanish armies had the weapons and means of the fighting the natives did not, American Indians started to learn new techniques and became more skilled in the fight against the Spains and their rulership.</u>
D. is not the right answer. Spain continued to support missions through its duration.
