<span>B) Behavior therapists assume that both abnormal behavior and normal behavior are learned. thus, good behavior is maintained by reinforcement, and unwanted behavior can be eliminated by punishment, I believe.</span>
Answer:
A) the poor and indebted citizens of England
Explanation:
- The Revolution happened in second half of 18th Century, so it is impossible to be addressed to those who lost property then.
- King of England would never address the slaves.
- So, it has to be C or D. It is D, because he is addressing the poor people who need to maintain their families.
Answer:
The correct answer choice to the question: What is a difference between a PAC and a super PAC, would be: PACs can contribute directly to candidates, but super PACs cannot.
Explanation:
PACs are generally known as political action committees and their direct purpose is to become an organization that receives donations and funds from members and supporters and directly play a role in a candidate´s campaign, a ballot, or a lawmaking process. However, PACs were placed under limitations as to how much money they could receive, and the sources of it, specifically corporations and labor unions, because they have direct impact on campaigns. In order to resolve that issue, super PACs, better known as independent-expenditure only committees, can receive unlimited funds from corporations and labor unions, as well as members, but these cannot go to impact a campaign. They can work with those funds in other ways, but not to impact a campaign, a ballot, or a lawmaking process.
According to Haywood the voting behavior of people is based on sociological factors as well as the overlapping process.
<h3>What is voting behavior?</h3>
This refers to how the members of the electorates act during the polls in their country.
It refers to what informs the decisions that people make concerning the elections in the nation.
People vote based on party affiliations, relationship with candidate and the social rules of the locality.
Read more on voter behavior here: brainly.com/question/27597605?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
<span>Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. To use the words of Martin Buber, the great Jewish philosopher, segregation substitutes an “I-it” relationship for an “I-thou” relationship, and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. So segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, but it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation.</span>
