One type of energy that society should most likely do away with is Coal because of its pollutant properties.
<h3>How much pollution does coal cause?</h3>
Using coal for energy causes a lot of pollution. Firstly, when coal is mined, the processes used can caused water pollution.
When coal is then burnt to produce energy, it emits dangerous mercury and sulfur dioxide compounds which have serious health and environmental effects.
It is therefore the perfect candidate for a resource that should be done away with completely.
Find out more on coal energy at brainly.com/question/14457681.
#SPJ1
Answer:
0.24
Explanation:
Let the probability of people believing that it is morally wrong to not report all income tax be P.


So the probability of people not believing that it is morally wrong to not report all income tax will be P'.


Hence the answer is 0.24
The correct answer is option A and option D. Remaining in the parental house as well as financial independence are the two key differences between Collectivist cultures, values and Individualistic society for emerging adults.
The wants and objectives of the group as a whole are prioritized over the needs and preferences of each individual in collective cultures. In such societies, each person's identity is fundamentally shaped by their connections to other individuals and their relationships with other group members.
A collectivist culture is well represented by Korea. Loyalty is a key component of the extended family, which is particularly significant in Korean culture. People in Korea are devoted to their families and fellow citizens, and they also feel a sense of duty to Korean society as a whole.
Learn more about Collectivistic culture here
brainly.com/question/14873316
#SPJ4
C cost could potentially not be covered even if the game sells very well
Answer:
Political uncertainty.
Explanation:
Political uncertainty is characterized as the potential threat to alter the executive power either through constitutional means or through unconstitutional methods. A high risk of executive breakdown results in slower growth and, likewise, that slow growth, increases the potential for a change in government. The likelihood of a change of government means uncertain future policies that are marked by economic downfall, social unrest, war, revolution, death of political leaders, etc.