Answer:
The principal repaid in the second year will be $33,296.
Explanation:
Out of each 37,341.79 payment a part of it will be principal repayment and a part of it will be interest payment. When the first 100,000 is paid (0.059*100,000)=5,900 is interest and (37,341-5,900)= 31,441 is principal repayment which means, that in the second year the principal remaining is (100,000-31,441)=68,559. So the interest payment in the second year will be (0.059*68,559)=4,045 and the principal repaid will be (37,341-4,045)=33,296.
Since Drea is facing an ethical dilemma and she wants to have the best option to her ethical dilemma, for the second step, she wouls have to: Identify feasible options. Option b.
<h3>What is an ethical dilemma?</h3>
In philosophy, ethical dilemmas—also known as ethical paradoxes or moral dilemmas—arise when an agent must choose between two competing moral obligations, none of which takes precedence. A definition that is similarly comparable describes ethical situations as ones where there is no right decision to be made.
An ethical problem, also known as a moral problem or ethical paradox, arises when a person must choose between two possibilities, none of which are wholly ethically acceptable.
An ethical conflict is an opposition between two morally righteous actions. A disagreement exists between two values or principles. The problem is that by choosing one correct action, you will invalidate the other right course because you would be acting both rightly and wrongly at the same moment.
Read more on ethical dilemma here: brainly.com/question/3838938
#SPJ1
Answer:
100%
Explanation:
Let the normal retail price of the sweater be 'SP' and the cost price be 'CP'
Therefore,
The selling price = SP - 40% of SP = SP - 0.4SP = 0.6SP
Now,
the profit = 20% of CP = 0.2CP
also,
Profit = Selling Price - Actual price
or
0.2CP = 0.6SP - CP
or
1.2CP = 0.6SP
Or
CP = 0.5SP
or
SP = 2CP
thus,
Increase percentage in sweater marked up from wholesale at its normal retail price
= 
or
= 
= 100%
The gross value of qualifying property left to the surviving spouse is included in the marital deduction. This is not a requirement of the unlimited marital deduction.
Hence, option D is the correct answer.
Unlimited marital deduction is a clause that enables a person to give their spouse limitless property at any time. This clause belongs to the federal estate of the United States. No limitation on the transfer of property is imposed.
There is no requirement for the gross value of the property that is kept for the surviving spouse under the unlimited marital deduction.
Option a is wrong because a husband and wife must be married in order to qualify for the unlimited marital deduction, this choice is incorrect.
Option b is improper since the property should be passed to the spouse through real estate under unlimited marital deductions.
Option c is erroneous because, in order to qualify for the unlimited marital deduction, the surviving spouse must be a citizen of the United States.
To know more about unlimited marital deduction: brainly.com/question/17983054
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct option is A
Explanation:
Contribution Margin = Sales - Variable expense
= $150,000 - $120,000
= $30,000
Doombug's Profit Margin = Avoidable fixed expenses - Contribution Margin
= $8,000 - $30,000
= ($22,000)
Increase or Decrease in net operating income = Additional contribution margin - Doombug's Profit Margin
= $16,000 - ($22,000)
= ($6,000)
Therefore, there is decrease in net operating income of Doombug. So, there is decrease of $6,000.
