Answer:
I think the answer is $1,500.
Explanation:
I hope this helps. If the answer is wrong then sorry and you don't have to give me the points. In here I think I did the calculation wrong.
Answer:
The pertinent focuses for Dan Jacobs choice are referenced beneath.
- The new hardware would cost GreenLife $4,500,000
-
The new hardware would twofold the creation yield of the old apparatus
The expense of new hardware and the expansion in the creation yield by 100% are the future expenses and incomes and thus they are significant for dynamic.
The old apparatus is bought previously. Consequently, the price tag of the old apparatus is immaterial for dynamic procedure. Tho director ought to consider the resale estimation of old apparatus in the dynamic. Tho resale estimation of old apparatus ought to be deducted from the expense of new hardware so as to ascertain the net money surge to buy the new apparatus.
The director ought to set up an expense and advantage examination or ascertain NPV (net present estimation) of the venture (capital planning investigation) to introduce it before the leader of the organization. The extra costs identified with extra creation ought to likewise be thought of. This investigation would support the supervisor and the president in dissecting that whether they should buy the new machine or not.
I think its pre-adjusted Trial balance???? But I am not for sure but Its the best I can give you
Answer:
the value of the project is $16,096.88
Explanation:
The computation of the value of the project is shown below:
= (Expected amount generated per year × (1 - (1 ++ rate of returm)^-time period )) ÷ rate of return
= $36,950 × [1 - 1.1^-6] ÷ 0.1
= $16,0926.88
Hence, the value of the project is $16,096.88
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
the manager risks legal enquiry for unjust dismissal of other employees for lateness as well.
Explanation:
Irrespective of an employee's performance, good or bad, a manager has to company policy regarding any misdemeanour should be meted out as at when due. This will ensure and give other employees the sense of responsibility to assume and resume as at when due and that no one in the organization is above the law.
Cheers