Answer:
fact or state of being accountable.
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
I think the answer is B. Less Likely.
This is because they don't want to risk getting caught drinking and driving. Though, in the real world, I think the answer would be C. Just as Likely, because some people don't care until they get caught/arrested.
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water) #ALM (All Lives Matter)</em></u>
Explanation:
the majority of Americans think that crime is less common than it really is =false
B=true
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
In a Direct Democracy, the power to govern the nation lies in the hands of the people instead of the elected representatives. Furthermore, in this particular form of democracy, political initiatives are taken directly by people.
