Answer:
Legal Realism school of jurisprudential thought, according to which shifting the legal structure of Dixonville in order to account for the changes that are occurring. Whereas the remaining ones are not relevant in this context.
Answer:
By mutual understanding and cooperation.
Explanation:
Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.
Answer:
The answer is: Stage 6 of "Reflective Reasoning"
Explanation:
The Reflective Judgment Model is used in order to describe how people from adolescence going to adulthood develop <u>"reasoning." </u>This framework consists of<em> 7 stages</em>. These stages are categorized under three kinds of thinking<em> (Pre-Reflective Reasoning, Quasi-Reflective Reasoning and Reflective Reasoning). </em>
The situation above falls under "Stage 6 of Reflective Reasoning." Under this stage,<u><em> "reflective thinking"</em></u> is considered. So, people in this stage know that<em> knowledge is not certain nor absolute,</em> thus they try to compare their opinion with others. Just like Carole and Juan above, even though they have opposing views, Carole understands Juan's opinion.
Thus, this explains the answer.
