Answer:
Option D is the correct answer to this question.
Explanation:
Laura sat in on only one of Amanda's presentations before giving her the promotion.
They were made by hand before slides were mounted on computers. Designing a PowerPoint presentation took several hours and though it was costly. Presentations were illustrated back then people with devices such as journal flip charts and computer monitors, but these have been used in schools and conference rooms worldwide.
Other options are incorrect because they are not related to the given scenario.
Option B. marginal.
The average fixed cost decreases as performance improves. Multiple choice problem. The total or production volume of a particular product or service produced. Total output per unit of work.
Marginal production cost measures the change in the total cost of a product due to the production of one additional unit of that product. Marginal cost (MC) is calculated by dividing the change in total cost (C) (Δ) by the change in quantity (Q).
Marginal cost is calculated by dividing the change in total cost by the change in quantity. Suppose Company A produces 100 units at a cost of $ 100. The company will then produce another 100 units at a cost of $ 90. Therefore, the marginal cost is a change in total cost, which is $ 90.
Learn more about marginal at
brainly.com/question/11689872
#SPJ4
Answer: F
Explanation:
An oligopoly is a market structure in which a large number of firms dominate the market.
An oligopoly is a market structure in which a large number of firms dominate the market. FALSE.
You should consider whether you want it to be a private or public company. A private company means that should the business fall-out, you and your business partners are responsible for the cost of the lawsuit and you will have to pay out of pocket. If your business is public, meaning that people can buy shares of your stock, then you would only have to pay up to the value of the amount of stock that you own. Hope that helps!
Answer:
The buyer will win, if the court finds that the $8,000 reduction in price is a fair reflection of the title defect.
Explanation: