1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivan
3 years ago
9

1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act

History
2 answers:
Evgen [1.6K]3 years ago
7 0
The BEST title for this would have to be Causes Of The Civil War
Akimi4 [234]3 years ago
5 0

Hello, I belive the best title for this would be Causes of the Civil War.

I hope that was enough to help you if it was please mark me as brainlies thank you and have the best day ever!

You might be interested in
Select all that apply. What upset the sepoys during the British East India Company's rule of India? A. They were paid less than
Flauer [41]
"<span>C. British tea was being imported into India" is correct, although there were also issues with pay. These issues weren't as much of an issue as the British importation, however. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
How did life in the South begin to change for African Americans after the Civil War?
Arisa [49]

Answer:

<em>3 key amendments to the Constitution adopted shortly after the war — abolishing slavery, guaranteeing equal protection and giving African Americans the right to vote — further cemented federal power.</em>

Explanation:

<em>hope this help</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Six factors for the rise of mwanamutapa empire​
Ulleksa [173]
Mark Brainliest please

Answer:

The following reasons can be used to account for the rise and expansion of the Mutapa state:
1. Scarcity of reasons such as salt, pastures etc at Great Zimbabwe
2. The Rise of militaristic and ambitious leaders such as Mutota.
3. The Abundance of salt in the Dande-Chidinma area.
4. The leadership disputes at Great Zimbabwe.
5. Population pressure at Great Zimbabwe.
6. The need to control the trade with the East Coast.
7. Availability of hunting grounds in the Mutapa state. 8. The eventual fall of the Great Zimbabwe State.
6 0
2 years ago
The Marshall Plan and the creation of NATO both...
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

D. Created a strong alliance between the US and Western European countries.

Explanation:

The Marshall Plan was a way for the US to provide aid to Western Europe in 1948 after the conclusion of WW2. WW2 left Europe in ruins, while the US, due to its geopolitical location, was left relatively unscathed on its home front. Through this plan, the US was ultimately able to provide billions of dollars in aid to Western Europe.

On the other hand, NATO stands for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and it was a mutual defense pact formed by the US and its allies. NATO included the US, Canada, and 10 Western European countries. With NATO, these countries essentially pledged to defend each other under attack and to collectively work towards their mutual safety and security.

Therefore, both NATO and the Marshall Plan strengthened the US's ties to Western Europe, making the answer D correct.

<u>We can also analyze the other answer choices to see why they're incorrect:</u>

Option A is incorrect because the Marshall Plan has nothing to do with the Korean War, it was simply a way to provide aid to Europe. Moreover, the Korean War was primarily between North Korea and South Korea, as a proxy war during the Cold War. Not all NATO countries were involved, and the US wasn't defending their own security, rather they were fighting Communism in Asia.

Option B is incorrect because the Marshall Plan provided huge sums of economic aid that only made rebuilding Europe easier.

Option C is incorrect because NATO only increased tensions. Not only did NATO mean that the US could station weapons in its member states (meaning weapons in closer proximity to the Soviet Union's territory) but it also made tensions impossible to deny. The Soviet Union and its allies would respond in 1955 with their own pact known as the Warsaw Treaty Organization.

6 0
2 years ago
The one in blue is the question
Papessa [141]

Answer: Without big farms to run, the people in the North did not rely on slave labor very much. In the South, the economy was based on agriculture. The North wanted the new states to be “free states.” Most northerners thought that slavery was wrong and many northern states had outlawed slavery.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Washington's main objective as President of the United States was to:
    14·2 answers
  • A main source of power and transportation for many factories and machines included
    9·2 answers
  • Who the power to print and coin money
    10·1 answer
  • How was Philadelphia more stoic than New Amsterdam?
    11·2 answers
  • Chinese women were allowed to marry after the age of 18 to any man
    8·2 answers
  • Which area was the last to be settled by Americans?
    5·1 answer
  • The tiny country of Japan conquered
    6·1 answer
  • Who did the Federalists believe should not run the government
    9·2 answers
  • Under the manorial system, nobles were required to provide serfs with which of the following?
    8·1 answer
  • What three factors account for challenges in the civil rights movement after 1965?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!