Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
Answer:
The insurer shall be held liable
Explanation:
For any published or displayed content which relates to the insurer or it's products, the insurer shall be made liable for any inappropriate content.
In cases wherein the advertisement function has been assigned to an insurance agency, even in such a scenarios, the sole responsibility rests with the insurer and it's their primary responsibility to check upon the content advertised.
Thus, if any inappropriate content or misleading claims are made, it shall be assumed those have been issued by consent of the insurer and the insurer cannot escape this liability.
Answer:
Amount of Social Security tax = $30.69
Explanation:
given data
earned = $495.00
pay = $6,492.39
to find out
How much should be withheld from Adam's gross pay for Social Security tax
solution
we assume here no pre tax is deductions
and social security tax rate is 6.2%
so Amount of Social Security tax will be
Amount of Social Security tax = earned × social security tax
Amount of Social Security tax = $495 × 6.2%
Amount of Social Security tax = $495 × 0.062
Amount of Social Security tax = $30.69
Answer:
E. All of the steps above are appropriate to take if she suspects identity theft.
Explanation:
Under suspicion of identity theft, it is better to take all the preventive measures listed in the example before the person who has stolen your debit card and checks makes use of them and steals the money in your bank account or makes big purchases.
