Answer:
WA 1,682
LIFO 910
FIFO 2,260
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}Date&Cost&Units&Subtotal\\$Jan 20th&8&400&3200\\$April 21th&10&200&2000\\$July 25th&13&280&3640\\$Sept 19th&15&90&1350\\$Total&10.51&970&10190\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7DDate%26Cost%26Units%26Subtotal%5C%5C%24Jan%2020th%268%26400%263200%5C%5C%24April%2021th%2610%26200%262000%5C%5C%24July%2025th%2613%26280%263640%5C%5C%24Sept%2019th%2615%2690%261350%5C%5C%24Total%2610.51%26970%2610190%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
We add the units purchase and the subtotal to get the total units available for sale.
Ending inventory physical units: 970 - 810 = 160 units
<u>Then, we calculate for each method:</u>
Weighted average:
cost of goods / available units = 10,190 / 970 = 10.51
160 units x 10.51 = 1,681.6
LIFO:
Ending inventory will be the oldest units:
160 units x 8 = 960
FIFO:
Ending inventory will be the newest units as the units are sold as soon as they come in
90 x 15 = 1,350
70 x 13 = 910
Total 2,260
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Answer:
an increase in equilibrium price and an indeterminate effect on equilibrium quantity.
Explanation:
An inferior good is a good whose demand increases when income falls and reduces when income rises.
If ramen is an inferior good, when income falls its demand would increase. This would lead to a rise in quantity and price.
An increase in the price of wheat would increase the cost of production of ramen. As a result, the supply of ramen would fall. Price would increase and supply would fall.
The combined effect would be an increase in equilibrium price but an indeterminate effect on equilibrium quantity.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
D. $4,960
Explanation:
Given cash balance = 4300
Receivable collection = 850
Bank charge = 20
NSF check = 170
Thus,
Adjusted bool balance = Cash balance + receivable collection- bank charge - NSF check
Therefore,
= 4300 + 850 - 20 - 170
= $4,960
So, adjusted cash balance = $4960
