The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Answer:
I think the answer is D. The colonial experience was one of absorbing British models of government, the economy, and religion.
Explanation:
I am not fully sure. But I hope this helps! Correct me if I made a mistake.
Establish the nation’s financial credibility
<span>Kanonsionni which means "people of the long house"</span>
The forces trying to overthrow the republic in the Spanish Civil War were led by <span>Francisco Franco.</span>
<span>
</span>
