1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LuckyWell [14K]
3 years ago
10

How was the antebellum two party system different from the gilded age two party system?

History
1 answer:
laila [671]3 years ago
7 0

The two-party system has been present in America for decades, and it has become one of the most prominent features of our political system. However, it has also undergone significant changes.

During the Antebellum period, the two dominant parties (Republicans and Democrats) were divided over the issue of slavery. The Republican Party was created in the late 1840s and early 1850s, and they held mostly abolitionist views. On the other hand, the Democrats consisted mostly of Southerners and rural Westerners, and they were, for the most part, pro-slavery.

During the Gilded Age, the most pressing issue was that of modernization. The Democratic Party incorporated much of the platform of the Populist Party, which tried to challenge big businesses. However, the Republicans dominated the political system between 1896 and 1932.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is a basic function of government?
Zigmanuir [339]
D because they want the nation to be safe from foreign attacks.
3 0
3 years ago
Classical civilizations created to honor wealth and powerful individuals
mamaluj [8]
Classical civilizations created "monuments" to honor wealth and powerful individuals, since these monuments were intended both to inspire the citizens and to intimidate foreign nations.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as which of the following?
maks197457 [2]
Generally speaking, a stance that supports a particular interpretation of history is known as a "<span>Historical argument," although there can still be bias involved depending on the historian's delivery. </span>
6 0
4 years ago
The First Correct Answer Will Get Brainiest!!!
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

The major effect of the Louisiana Purchase was that it made the United States much bigger than it had been before. The Purchase doubled the land area of the country. This helped to make Americans feel like their country was strong and important, contributing to a sense of nationalism.

Explanation:

Mark me brainliest

5 0
3 years ago
Hurston’s situation upon moving to Harlem could be best described as ______________.
melamori03 [73]
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. Hurston's situation upon moving to harlem could be best described as jaded and disengaged. <span>Several authors have observed that Hurston engaged in significant plagiarism in at least three works. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • About how long ago did people start farming for the first time?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the main policy objectives of the republican and american parties?
    15·1 answer
  • Where and Where did Marco Polo travel?​
    10·1 answer
  • 5. What constitutional question did the use of this technology raise?​
    7·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of trust<br>​
    9·2 answers
  • What was manorialism?
    5·2 answers
  • What are 8 factors that led to Meiji era in Japan??
    8·1 answer
  • The delegates to the constitutional convention decided to
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Marshall Plan affect the United<br> States?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of these men held a monopoly in the oil industry?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!