1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
3 years ago
5

Which statement summarizes property rights according to the fifth amendment of the us constitution

History
1 answer:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
8 0

The fifth amendment creates a number of rights revelant to both criminal and civil legal proceedings.

You might be interested in
During the Gilded Age, how did the US Congress act to regulate business practices?
Tju [1.3M]

The US Congress acted to regulate the practices of business during the gilded age by not creating any law for the growth of monopolistic businesses.

Option A is the correct answer.

<h3>What is a monopoly?</h3>

A monopoly is a type of economic market where there is a sole seller in respect of selling a certain kind of product with no close substitutes.

Gilded Age was the time period of increase in the economic growth of the US country from the year 1870 till the year 1900. It was the time span where the US country flourished its businesses in the large sector of the economy like factories, mining of coal, and building of railroads.

Therefore, there was no law passed for encouraging monopolistic businesses in the Glided age by the US congress.

Learn more about the glided age in the related link:

brainly.com/question/21199270

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
America had a two-fold imperialistic interest in Hawaii, one was using it as a base for Asian interests and the other was to dev
miskamm [114]
                 the answer is c .........................
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Supreme Court case that legalized same sex relationships?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.[2][3]

Between January 2012 and February 2014, plaintiffs in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee filed federal district court cases that culminated in Obergefell v. Hodges. After all district courts ruled for the plaintiffs, the rulings were appealed to the Sixth Circuit. In November 2014, following a series of appeals court rulings that year from the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits that state-level bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, the Sixth Circuit ruled that it was bound by Baker v. Nelson and found such bans to be constitutional.[4] This created a split between circuits and led to a Supreme Court review.

Decided on June 26, 2015, Obergefell overturned Baker and requires all states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other jurisdictions.[5] This established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court examined the nature of fundamental rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution, the harm done to individuals by delaying the implementation of such rights while the democratic process plays out,[6] and the evolving understanding of discrimination and inequality that has developed greatly since Baker.[7]

Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by law, court ruling, or voter initiative in thirty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.[3]

7 0
3 years ago
What might have happened if they didn't agree to the Mayflower Compact?
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer: The Mayflower Compact created laws for Mayflower Pilgrims and non-Pilgrims alike for the good of their new colony. It was a short document which established that: the colonists would remain loyal subjects to King James, despite their need for self-governance.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did the American first railroads carry?
Svetradugi [14.3K]
B.cotton from the south were carried on railroads to shippings ports to be exported
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the main reason that the southern economy remained largely agricultural?
    13·2 answers
  • Much of modern Indian culture can be traced to which early Indian culture?<br> erian
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes a major similarity between a point of view and a bias?
    14·1 answer
  • The New Right felt that federal welfare programs _____. lowered taxes and strengthened the traditional family were key to ending
    6·2 answers
  • What can the ancient societies of Mesoamerica teach us about society today?
    12·1 answer
  • What is not true about the treaty of brest-litovsk of 1918
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following did Julius Caesar accomplish in his short time in power
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement describes the experiences of the Tuskegee Airmen during World War II? A They defended Allied bombers despite bei
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a cause of the Renaissance?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 freed all slaves, but many continued in slavery until after the war. Why would many in
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!