Answer:
The correct answer is "A probate court case on a will of a deceased person"
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States of America has put forward the judicial powers of the federal courts under Article 3. These powers are conferred upon the Supreme Court and other courts who's status is lower than that of the Supreme Court and were created by the Congress.
Section 2 of this article details a broad scope of the powers these courts posses. It maintains that the power extends to all cases in which the US is a party, cases that cover ambassadors and public officials, cases that involve two states, cases that involve citizens of different states. and cases between states and foreign states or entities.
In light of the above mentioned powers, all of the options in the question except the one concerning the probate court case fall under the ambit of federal courts. Federal courts do no have the power to probate wills. These cases are left to the state courts
If Dr. Maple is a behaviorist, he would most likely believe that the cause of a child's disruptive behavior in school is the result of "his prior experiences".
Behaviorism, otherwise called behavioral psychology, is a hypothesis of learning which base their idea that all practices are gained through conditioning. This happens through association with the surroundings. Behaviorists trust that our reactions to environmental stimuli shape our activities. Behaviorism is concerned about how ecological factors influence recognizable conduct.
The Vietnam War was a violent battle that lasted for many years and had the controversial participation of the USA. In this conflict, the USA used state-of-the-art equipment and has more weapons to use and guarantee victory in the war. However, the Vietnamese army, even at a disadvantage in terms of armaments and technology, came out victorious because they had the advantage of the region's climate and topography.
Vietnam had a topography with little linearity and extensive vegetation, which allowed the Vietnamese to use their knowledge about the place and hide various traps that were not located by American equipment and caused American soldiers to be captured.
Answer:
B: Roman women had some legal rights and were able to attend public events whereas Greek women were more secluded.
Explanation:
In Greece, there was a contrast between two prominent city-states, Athens and Sparta. Athens did not look upon women as Sparta did. While Athens women were considered lower than slaves, Spartan women were independent and could even own property. Apart from those two cities, Greek women in general did not have any political clout. Married women could have some opinion over their husbands’ political views but they did not have any rights such as vote or hold political office. In fact, it was considered improper for a woman to discuss politics in a public setting. In most city-states, women were accompanied wherever they had to go; their main role was to give birth to children, particularly to male.
Roman women could shop, speak with friends, and visit temples without asking their husband for permission. During the years that Rome was an Empire, women gained more freedom and it was legal for women to own land, run businesses, free slaves, make wills, inherit wealth, and get paid jobs. In ancient Rome, only free adult men were citizens. Although women were not citizens of ancient Rome, they enjoyed a great deal more freedom than did women in ancient Greece.
In Rome
In general, Roman women enjoyed more freedom than women in Classical Athens.
