Answer:
Isolates
Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.
Bystanders
Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.
Participants
Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.
Activists
Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.
Diehards
Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.
Explanation:
Answer: Option A -- Create a free -trade zone for United States, Mexico and Canada
Explanation:
NAFTA is an acronym for North American Free Trade Agreement, is an agreement signed in 1st of January, 1994 by the trio - USA, Mexico and Canada, creating a trilateral trade alliance in North American, and purposely to create a free-trade zone for the trio -- USA, Canada and Mexico. NAFTA overrides the Canada -USA free trade earlier signed in 1988.
Early Roman alphabet is the answer.
The correct answer is <span>post-conventional moral reasoning.
</span>According to Kohlberg's theory of moral development, post-conventional moral reasoning is the highest level of moral development a person can achieve in their lifespan. This type of moral reasoning is based on autonomous judgments based one one's own personal morals and value systems. While people with post-conventional moral reasoning understand and agree with society's laws and values to an extent, they are aware that they are not always the best option depending on the situation at hand.
Hi. I am not sure if those written after the statement are the choices. Just in case they are the choices, let me go ahead and answer this one for you. The economy of Australia is characterized by prosperity. They have a mixed market economy. It is home to some of the largest companies in the world.
The answer would be: prosperity
