Answer: a conic projection
Explanation:
a projection made by placing a paper cone over a lighted globe so that the axis of the cone aligns with the axis of the globe
Answer:
A:3, B:1, C:2
Explanation:
1. Concurrent jurisdiction: Cases involving state and federal questions and cases.
2. Exclusive state jurisdiction: Cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction.
3. Exclusive federal jurisdiction: Cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Concurrent jurisdiction arises in cases which can be heard in more than one court, it allows more than one court the authority to hear a case, for example divorce cases can be heard in a local district level court, a family court or any one of the district courts
Federal jurisdiction arise in cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Exclusive state jurisdiction arises in cases not subject to federal laws but state laws
Answer:
B
Explanation:
a failure to interpret the incident as an emergency.
Answer:
1. Co-variance= -1.2
2. correlation coefficient= -0.4404
3. There is weak negative relationship between x and y.
Explanation:
1.
Co-variance= Cov(x,y)= sum[(x-xbar)(y-ybar)]/n
xbar=sumx/n=32/5=6.4
ybar=sumy/n=35/5=7
x 7 8 5 3 9
x-xbar 0.6 1.6 -1.4 -3.4 2.6
y 7 5 9 7 7
y-ybar 0 -2 2 0 0
(x-xbar)(y-ybar) 0 -3.2 -2.8 0 0
Cov(x,y)= sum[(x-xbar)(y-ybar)]/n=-6/5=-1.2
Cov(x,y)=-1.2
2.
correlation coefficient=r
x 7 8 5 3 9
x-xbar 0.6 1.6 -1.4 -3.4 2.6
y 7 5 9 7 7
y-ybar 0 -2 2 0 0
(x-xbar)(y-ybar) 0 -3.2 -2.8 0 0
(x-xbar)² 0.36 2.56 1.96 11.56 6.76
(y-ybar)² 0 4 4 0 0
r=-0.4404
3. Since the value of correlation coefficient is negative and less than 0.5 , so, we can say that there is weak negative relationship between x and y.
