Answer:if your talking ab andrew Jackson then:
Explanation: Andrew Jackson hated the National Bank for a variety of reasons. Proud of being a self-made "common" man, he argued that the bank favored the wealthy. As a westerner, he feared the expansion of eastern business interests and the draining of specie from the west, so he portrayed the bank as a "hydra-headed" monster
Answer:
No, Napoleon's rule definitely did not represent the fulfillment of the French Revolution ideals, because the French Revolution was a liberal revolution, in the sense that it sought the establishment of a new rule where personal liberties where respected, where people were equal before the law, and where the government was accountable to the people, and served the people.
Explanation:
Napoleon on the other hand, was simply a dictator. Perhaps a very skilled and smart dictator, but a dictator nonetheless. He was not accountable to the people, and could do with the country what he pleased. He got France involved in a series of wars (the Napoleonic Wars), imposed his dictatorial rule over most of Western Europe, and caused the dead of thousands of soldiers with his disastrous decision to invade Russia.
Napoleon was like a new monarch, and the French Revolution was so contrary to the monarchy that its leaders beheaded the last French King: Louis XVI. For all these reasons, Napoleon was the opposite to what the French Revolution sought.
Answer:
the president is given the power to shape policy by asserting some influence over what Congress discusses and what bills it attempts to pass.
Explanation:
I’m pretty positive it would be A
1) The upset they didn't gain as much land as they wanted and the way they were treated at the treaty of Versailles.
2) Their Italian monarchy (government) was failing them felt there weak leadership. Italy was looking for strong leader, Italy was looking for a Caesar who would solve their problems.
3) Mussolini promised the rebuild Italy to the glory of Rome
4) Mussolini promised economic trasformation
