Answer:
The main way to make this argument is to say that it is exceedingly difficult for the government to determine what constitutes an unfair job. This is something that is beyond the ability of the government to judge.
It is one thing for the government to protect workers from things like unsafe jobs. It is much more possible to decide in an objective way what jobs are unsafe. We can look at things like workplace injuries and deaths and say that a job is unsafe. It is also clear that workers should not be subjected to unsafe conditions while at work.
By contrast, things are very much more difficult when it comes to the issue of fairness. There is no objective way to determine (for example) whether it is unfair for a fast food restaurant in New York City to pay its employees $8.00 per hour after they have been working there 2 or 3 years.
Because of such issues, it does not make sense for the government to protect workers from unfair jobs. It is simply impossible to determine what jobs are unfair when it comes to things like wages or opportunities for advancement. Therefore, (we can argue) the government should not try to make these decisions.
Bro tbh ion know what u talm bout but bro helping u out ^^
Consumers were offered with variety of choices of goods in the market. Factory system enabled mass production of products at cheaper rate with high quality.
Factory system replaced the indigenous system wherein goods are produced by simple techniques. With evolution of machines, the quality of the product highly increased which led to customer satisfaction. The price of the products was fair and the purchasing power of the consumers increased which afforded them to buy the product.
Due to the availability of cheap labor, workers were employed in factories and were made to stay nearby factories so that they can be easily supervised. Housing facilities were given to the workers by the factory owners which highly motivated the workers to work for extra hours for an increased output.
Answer:
One party avoids addressing issues that are controversial. Two parties perform watchdog functions on each other.
Explanation:
I don't know how to explain my answer.
<span>to build military strength to deter aggression</span>
