This is most evidently a metaphor. The thing to keep in mind when analyzing literature/poetry is that if you see figurative language making comparisons/drawing parallels between two differing things--instances where the meaning is not literal such as how injustice is not really a fire and has no flames--it's a safe bet you'll have on your hands a metaphor.
Answer:
Uncle Carlos believes that the policeman did not kill Khalil for racism, but because he was a drug dealer. Mav, on the other hand, believes that Khalil was a victim of racism, since he was not armed, carrying drugs or weapons at the time he was murdered.
Explanation:
Khalil. a black boy, was killed in a police approach while picking up a hairbrush in his car. The policeman hit Khalil with several shots, and Khalil posed no threat.
Uncle Carlos, a black policeman, does not believe that the policeman was acting out of racism, since Khalil disobeyed him and was a boy who, in fact, was involved in the drug tafico. However, Mav knows that Khalil was not on drugs or weapons at the time and that he suffered abuse of police authority, as well as racism.
Answer:
the substance tastes bitter
Answer:
It would be very difficult because there are a lot of people in my middle school. It would be the hardest in P.E in my opinion, because you can't hear or see if there is a ball being thrown at you. You can get hurt.
Explanation:
Answer: True
Explanation: Attitudes can be formed through interaction with and observation of others. An individual with an ambivalent attitude is often more difficult to persuade. In persuasion, one-sided arguments are generally less effective than two-sided arguments.
