1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VLD [36.1K]
3 years ago
14

Develop an argument that evaluates the extent to which government responses to economic change in the late nineteenth and the tu

rn of the twentieth centuries were similar in Qing China and in the Ottoman Empire
History
1 answer:
QveST [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Since the debt crisis, the idea that public credit is the first step aimed at the loss of national sovereignty through an economic intervention has expanded. China Qing and the Ottoman Empire were caught in the vicious circle of debt

It is a very similar story that two of the most powerful empires of the pre-modern era became states that depend on international credit in the industrial age. Qing China and the Ottoman Empire suffered a long period of decline that ended their imperial status by 1840.

Explanation:

The two countries suffered some kind of crisis towards the second half of the century that pushed them towards indebtedness abroad, which would lead to the contracting of debt in international markets in order to cope with their long decline, and with the hope of modernize their industry. Following that debt would lead them to accept, foreign intervention.

During the war, the Turks, without an army with the power to confront the Egyptians, had to request the help of their former enemies, forcing the intervention of Britain and Russia. International aid was not free, and its price was through the Balta Treaty, where Turkey agrees to adopt a free market system, withholding taxes on imports.

The case of the Qing dynasty in China was very similar. By 1820, the empire showed symptoms of clear economic damage. Stuck in an extremely restrictive trading system, through which all international trade demanded through the Cohong guild, China collided with Western interests during the First Opium War. The defeat marked the beginning of a long process of decline.

You might be interested in
What were the effects after Diocletian split the Roman Empire?
stealth61 [152]

Answer:

The Roman Empire was once a superpower. Back in the days of the early 2nd century, Emperor Trajan stretched the kingdom's territory to its maximum. After that, how to secure the frontier had become an issue that all the future emperors had to address. Because most of those emperors were not nearly as capable as Trajan, the Roman Empire was soon in trouble. By the 3rd century, the situation had grown so bad that this once formidable powerhouse was at the brink of self-destruction. During the period from 235 A.D. to 284 A.D. (often called the crisis of the third century, the military anarchy, or the imperial crisis), more than two-dozen emperors came and went. Out-of-control inflation brought the economy to its knees. And foreign tribes continued to harass the borders. Just as things could not get worse for the Roman Empire, relief finally arrived. In November of 284 A.D., Diocletian, a forceful Roman general, seized power and declared himself the new emperor. One of his earliest orders was to split the Roman Empire in two. He kept the eastern part and gave the western half to his colleague, Maximian.  Diocletian's decision was bold but practical. He figured that the Roman Empire had simply grown too big over the years to be managed effectively by a single person. In 285 A.D., he named his trusted military friend, Maximian, as a Caesar or a junior emperor, while he himself was named an Augustus or a senior emperor. The following year, Diocletian promoted Maximian to be his equal, so both men held the title of Augustus and ruled the split Roman Empire side-by-side. Diocletian chose the city of Nicomedia (modern day's Izmit, Turkey) to be the capital of his Eastern Roman Empire, whereas Maximian picked Milan to be the capital of his Western Roman Empire. With the kingdom broken into two, Diocletian and Maximian were each responsible for fighting the enemies in their respective territory. As it was no longer necessary to stretch the troops across the entire empire, it was much easier to put down the rebels. Diocletian's daring experiment paid off handsomely. By 293 A.D., Diocletian decided to go a step further and resolve the issue of succession once and for all. That year, both of the senior emperors handpicked their own Caesar. Diocletian chose Galerius, and Maximian selected Constantius. Galerius and Constantius were like apprentices. They did not sit idly waiting for the two senior emperors to die or to retire. Instead, they were each given a sizable territory and had their own capital. Galerius resided at Sirmium (in today's Serbia), and Constantius camped at Trier (in today's Germany). Diocletian called this new power structure tetrarchy or "rule by four."

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Describe the 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th amendments
Salsk061 [2.6K]
Twenty-seven of these, having been ratified by the requisite number of states, are part of the Constitution. The first ten amendments were adopted and ratified simultaneously and are known collectively as the Bill of Rights. Six amendments adopted by Congress and sent to the states have not been ratified by the required number of states. Four of these amendments are still technically open and pending, one is closed and has failed by its own terms, and one is closed and has failed by the terms of the resolution proposing it.

<span><span>An amendment may be proposed and sent to the states for ratification by </span><span> amendment becomes an operative addition to the Constitution.....</span></span>

<span><span>
</span></span>

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement was in an early draft of the Declaration of Independence, but not in the final version? A. Slavery was evil. B.
Sergio039 [100]
For further info, see the response I offered here on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9510974#readmore
5 0
4 years ago
3. What are the themes to the causes of the Civil War?<br> A.<br> B.<br> C.<br> D.<br> E.
lora16 [44]

Answer:

no answer choice

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What finally led to US participation in World War I
Sophie [7]
In 1917, Germany attacked some passengers in submarines from the US that led the US to assist in WW1. Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Mormons face troubles with their neighbors in Independence, Missouri?
    9·1 answer
  • Why didn't voters in the assemblies have as much power as the magistrates or senate
    6·2 answers
  • Summarize the ideologies of conservatism, liberalism, and nationalism.
    15·2 answers
  • How did other European countries view France when it was ruled by the dicectory
    7·1 answer
  • after the death of queen elizabeth I there was canstant conflict between her successors and parliament which eventually led to a
    10·1 answer
  • Americans sought to obtain control of New Orleans in 1803 so that ?
    12·1 answer
  • Em que se consistia o projeto nazista denominado de solução final?​
    8·1 answer
  • Of the 4 million troops the US mobilized during World War I,_____ some
    10·2 answers
  • Thomas Jefferson statement "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" comes from a direct reference from writings of
    6·1 answer
  • Most archaeologists and historians believe that the first peoples who colonized the americas came from.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!