I think that you just answered your own question in the question you asked.
Were the colonists justified in resisting British policies after the French and Indian War? The colonists were justified in revolting against the British. If the colonists wanted to revolt that was their choice. ... Also the brits had no right making the colonists pay for taxes of the French Indian War.
A historical source that might distort the information by putting a strong preference or viewpoint is considered a biased source.
<h3>What is a historical source?</h3>
A historical source is the ones that existed in ancient history like the artifacts, sculptures, coins, etc.
When the point of view or opinions in respect of a historical source deforms the provided information, then that source is regarded as a biased source. This is the source that has differentiated opinions or is defined in inappropriate language.
Therefore, the biased source is the one that portrays a strong opinion which ultimately distorts the original information.
Learn more about the biased source in the related link:
brainly.com/question/4357533
#SPJ1
Answer:
the correct answer is TRUE
Explanation:
In the early 1900s, a German scientist named Alfred Wegener produced a theory of continental drift. Using supporting evidence from various scientific disciplines, he proposed that all of the continents were once joined together in a single land mass, referred to as Pangaea.
Hope it helps you
Mark my answer as brainlist
have a nice day
