Answer:
True in most cases
Explanation:
This fact established can also be compared to a successful father or head male, if a father is successful, then there is tendency that the children will have that influence from there father to become successful ,so everything boils down to the father compared to the mother. Regardless of the gender of the children .So can be said about the criminality of the fathers can be of an influence to the children but note there is a possibility it might not happen( the children Also becoming a criminal), but in most true cases it happens but it all depends on the father and the mother generally.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Without precipitation, there will be no enough water for your daily uses such as water for drinking, agriculture and so on. Air currents also have an effect on us as we rely the air currents in travelling in the bodies of water. Plus, air curents have an effect on the weather too.
Answer:
I think it’s D I don’t know for sure tho but I think it’s that hope you get it correct
Explanation:
Dante invented the concept of contrapasso, the idea that sinners should be punished in a way that mirrors or resembles the sin. Dante primarily intended to explain biblical justice through his contrapasso, but in order to do so more effectively, expanded upon tradition, and thus inevitably added some of his own invention.