Sentence three is the correct sentence. All of the others have some grammatical error in them. In the first, "felled" is incorrect and not a word. It also says "walk boots" instead of the correct verbal adjective "walking boots." In the second, "weren't" is not usually considered very academic and "tight" should be in the adverb form "tightly." Number four is wrong because it used "walked boots" instead of of "walking boots" and "tight" instead of "tightly." "Fallen" is incorrect in number 4, because it should have been "had fallen" if one was going to use the verb "fallen."
If your choices are the following:
<span>a. order of importance
b. chronological order
c. spatial order
d. process order
Then the answer would be A. order of importance. This is when the author organized his ideas through the use of important events in the story.</span><span />
Answer:
The claim regarding whether the strategies used are effective
Explanation:
The above shows that, the information that is missing from the introduction to the rhetorical analysis essay happens to be the claims about the strategies being used. That is, if the said strategies happens to be effective or not effective.
Answer:
1. In the second sermon, Paneloux refers to the New Testament by comparing the suffering of the "earthly" father at the death of his child with God's suffering at the death of Christ. Paneloux says that the cross is the symbol, face to face, with the suffering child.
2. Paneloux dies, clutching a crucifix. His death, however, is less violent than a typical plague death, and his case is recorded as a "Doubtful case."
3 Soon thereafter, Paneloux falls ill, but he refuses to consult a doctor. His symptoms do not conform to those of the plague, so when he dies, Rieux marks him as a "doubtful case."
