Answer:
The question is incomplete as sections are not given. Sections 6 and 7 are:
6. Cloning also brings many pet owners great joy. Nicky was a beloved Maine Coon cat owned by a woman in Texas named Julie. Nicky’s owner was devastated when he passed away in 2004. Thanks to cloning, Julie has a new special friend. She says that Little Nicky is healthy and happy. Besides looking just like the first Nicky, Little Nicky shares some of his distinctive behaviors—proving the wonders of cloning. This includes an unusual fascination with water.
7. There is also the well-documented story of Missy, the Border collie-husky mix. Missy’s owner missed her so much that he founded a company that helps private citizens clone their pets. Fifteen years after Missy’s passing, Mira was born. Mira bears a striking resemblance to Missy and behaves just like her as well. Two additional Missy clones, Chingu and Sarang, live with family members and often visit their “twin sister” Mira.
<u>The correct answer is option D.</u>
<u></u>
Explanation:
In the sections mentioned above, there are two examples of pet cloning that have brought joy to the owners who lost their pets. We can see that emotions motivated pet lovers to clone their pets. It was their emotional connections to their pets that led them to clone their pets. Pet cloning has brought joy to many pet lovers like Missy's and Nicky's.
So, from the given options, the option that best supports the idea of the given sections is option D.
Um I'm assuming you didn't finish typing out this question??
Answer:
B. A website
Explanation:
According to the question, Jill used different sources for her paper about platypus and the third source she used is a website.
This is because, the website link is provided, date, time accessed and date, all of which are necessary when quoting a source from a website.
Answer:
Judge Patterson’s background illustrates the entrenched culture that makes it difficult to secure justice for Walter. By resisting de-segregation, which was a federally issued mandate, Patterson demonstrated his willingness to break the law in order to preserve the practice of discriminating against black people. Stevenson’s arguments, which claim that Walter’s conviction was faulty because of racial bias and illegal proceedings, likely seem irrelevant to Patterson, who has demonstrated his loyalty to racist traditions over the law. Patterson isn’t the first person in the book to question where Stevenson is from: this illustrates the importance that Stevenson places on the anti-outsider mentality he encountered in Southern courts.
Explanation:
