My friend and I. is a fragment.
Answer:
D. No, since some theories better account for more important data than do others.
Explanation:
While it is true that total objectivity is impossible, and no theory can fully explain a phenomenon, some theories are better than others at explaining things (mostly because they are built on previous theories).
For example, Einstein's General Relativity is better at explaining the Universe than Newton's laws of general motion, or Copernicus' heliocentric view of the Universe, even while the three theories are an improvement over the Ptolemaic geocentric cosmology that dominated Western thought for millenia.
And while Einstein's theories are not perfect, adhering to Newton's or Copernicus' theory instead would be unscientific.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The question does not include any chart. However, there is a chart that refers to a situation like this. That chart aims to build support for the following aspect of government employment: Rewarding current long-term employees.
In the chart, we can see the title "The Number of Years Worked by Civilian Cyber Employees Before Separating From Federal Employment." On the "x" axis we have the years from 2009 to 2014. On the "y" axis we see the number of employees. Employees from one to four years, the chart shows that the top is 1,000. However, for employees with more than 30 years, the top is 2,000.
Answer:
why do you think Noah's Ark worked? and how did all of the animals on that ark didn't eat each other, for they were stuck together for months?
Is it Proprietor?....if not ion know
