The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.
Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.
Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.
Answer:after Great Britain and Prussia's victory over France and Spain during the Seven Years' War. The signing of the treaty formally ended the Seven Years' War, ...
Explanation:
Answer:
"Back in school, before Camp, I was shorter and smaller than the rest of the kids. I was always the last to be picked for any team when we played games."
"‘…America is at war with Japan, and the government thinks that Japanese Americans can’t be trusted.’"
Explanation:
Although you did not present the excerpts to which the question refers, we can consider the two options selected above to be the correct answers. This is because cause and effect relationships are those where one element causes another element to occur. In this case, in the first option, we can see that the narrator was always the last one to be chosen for the teams (effect) because he was the smallest child in the camp (cause). In the second option, we can see that no one trusted Japanese-American citizens (effect) because the American government was at war with Japan (cause).
The transcontinental railroad let the settlers go to the western side of America. With that they needed more farms for food and resources to provide a profit. The settlers did not want to do the work to they forced slaves to work for them. The settlers in the west made slavery increase due to the wanted of profit and the needing to survive.
