Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech)
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer)
Explanation: Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Battle of Antietam, also called Battle of Sharpsburg, (September 17, 1862), in the American Civil War (1861–65), a decisive engagement that halted the Confederate invasion of Maryland, an advance that was regarded as one of the greatest Confederate threats to Washington, D.C. The Union name for the battle is derived .
PLEASE BRAINLIEST
September !, 1939 is the correct answer, Hope this helps :)
Answer: C. An autocracy keeps power in the hands of one person, and a direct democracy does not.
Explanation:
Both autocracy and direct democracy are political systems, or a system of government, however, both systems are very different from each other.
An Autocracy is a political system where government decisions are made by a single person. This person can make all the decisions of the country, from enacting laws to imposing punishments.
Direct democracy is one in which people directly elect their leaders. An example of direct democracy is when a group decides by raising its hand.
I hope this information can help you.
