Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
Answer:
A. Always use your high beams.
Explanation:
Headlights are to be use in 'seriously reduced' weather or atmosphere, which include fog; Use full beam headlights at night when the road ahead is completely clear. Avoid dazzling other road users when driving at night
Answer:
Engel V. Vitale (School Prayer)- Freedom of religion
Explanation:
The Supreme Court concluded that school- mandated prayers were unconstitutional. Teaching prayers and encouraging recitation did not go in line with all religions, therefore, the Supreme Court ruled to just stop the praying.
Answer:
А. They may have to rely on former friends for transportation, putting them back in touch with the criminal world.
Explanation:
Being a criminal isn't an individual thing, rather it is really a group situation. For many offenders, their only friends are other criminals or those more likely to commit criminal acts. Thus, having only their friends to rely on for rides (Which is what most people will do) creates a risk of secondary deviance.
