Answer:
The similarities are very distinct.
Explanation:
So the gestapos were the official secret police of Nazi Germany and German-occupied Europe. The force was created by Hermann Göring in 1933 by combining the various security police agencies of Prussia into one organisation. And what they did was kill and or torture anyone who was against the Nazi party or Hitler at that time. They we’re also responsible for the roundup of Jews throughout Europe for deportation to extermination camps. They helped imply and create the scapegoating against people who were Jewish all over Nazi-occupies Europe. Mr. Thurgood Marshall felt like he was seeing the same thing in The United States as well. He explains this in an authoritative report aptly titled "The Gestapo in Detroit, " which was lead by the NAACP, showing beyond reasonable dispute that local police had joined a mob of whites in terrorizing black neighborhoods, this was happening in Detroit in 1943 around the same time as the Second World War. So this makes sense that he could make this correlation. Two minority groups from different places around the world we’re facing brutality from the police and hate groups about things they cannot change. For the diverse people of Detroit it was their skin colour for the Jewis and “non-aryan” race of Germany and Europe it was religion or family history for example. So both ways these people were being prosecuted by law enforcement and Thurgood Marshall believed if the gestapos happened even more in the USA they couldn’t be stopped or changed and it would end in many innocent people being killed or tortured just like what the gestapo did for Hitler in Europe.
It was showed as a surplus because it was a surplus when it came to the budget. The problem behind it that for the first time in a while, the United States budget worked with a surplus after the year ended even though it was not the idea of a surplus that the people believed.
The surplus disappeared because it never really existed. It was a surplus but it didn't mean that the country was not in debt. The country had a huge amount of debt to other countries or to companies or to any other institution such as a bank. The surplus was eaten up by the debt accumulated over the years. There was a surplus, but the debt was not reduced.
Answer: The Heiji War was a civil war between the Taira and Minamoto clans.
Explanation:
Answer:
The official British reply to the colonial case on representation was that the colonies were “virtually” represented in Parliament in the same sense that the large voteless majority of the British public was represented by those who did vote. To this Otis snorted that, if the majority of the British people did not have the vote, they ought to have it. The idea of colonial members of Parliament, several times suggested, was never a likely solution because of problems of time and distance and because, from the colonists’ point of view, colonial members would not have adequate influence.
