Hello!
The constitution guards against the concentration of power by having established the separation of powers.
Separation of Powers, also known as "checks and balances" is the way in which the U.S. government is split into different branches:
- The executive branch (the president)
- The legislative branch (the house of representatives and the senate)
- The judicial branch (the courts and judges)
By having a separation of powers, no single branch can take over or build up too much power. Each branch has a different role in government, so no branch has power over everything; they all need to work together in order to make an efficient government.
I hope this helps you! Have a lovely day!
- Mal
Answer:
The right answer is “banking”
Explanation:
The first bank that was founded was in Florence in the Renaissance whose name was the Medici Bank, in 1397. It introduced the extension of credit, practiced the compromise loans to clients in distant nations, engrossed new and good clients to Italy and help to make easy the trade of goods. It has operations in the big cities of Italy, and in its hometown as well, such as Venice and Genoa.
UN Resolution 687 was passed.
Populism rise to promote democratization and to have a government for the people. In Brazil, populism was used by their President Getulio Vargas to be in his place. In Argentina, the government used populism to increase wages but resulted in inflation because of instability to sustain economic reforms to people.
The two most mentioned disagreements of Jefferson and Hamilton by history channels about how the monetary system of the USA should work can notably be about Hamilton's plan on establishing a National Bank, where Jefferson strongly opposed, arguing that the Congress does not have the power to create a bank. And Hamilton alongside that plan of having a National Bank also plans to create tariffs, or what we commonly call tax nowadays and to consolidate the nation's debt that they incurred during the American Revolution but again Jefferson is strongly opposed this idea because he argued that the creating tariffs would be a burden to farmers or the regular people, and if the debts are consolidated, the states that have already paid off their own debts would have to pay for the debts of other states.
