Answer:
value creation; value capture
Explanation:
Curry is analysing value creation. Value creation can be defined as the existing difference that exist in the buyer's value of a customer and the cost of a firm in rendering a service or in giving a product.
Cassie on the other hand is analysing value capture. Value capture is a situation whereby a firm accrues profit by charging a price that exceeds the cost they got for a product or for rendering service
Answer:
There was plenty of good land available for farming.
Assets are the resources that a corporation owns or manages and which are anticipated to be beneficial in the future.
More about assets:
A useful resource that a company owns or rent and that helps to run your business is referred to as an asset in the business world. Intangible assets like goodwill, reputation, and brand recognition can also be used as resources, in addition to tangible things like computers and small sums of money.
Assets are resources that can be used to produce value, be sold, or be converted into cash in accounting. Examples include your inventory, bank account balances, accounts receivable, pre-paid expenses, etc.
Assets can typically be divided into categories based on their nature and type based on their physical qualities, such as current assets, fixed assets, tangible assets, and intangible assets, and their ability to be converted into cash.
Learn more about assets here:
brainly.com/question/14826727
#SPJ4
The statement "Most of the families who homesteaded in the west were happy and healthy, enjoyed the work, and were rewarded with bountiful harvests." is a true statement.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are harvests?</h3>
Generally, the time of year when agricultural crops are ready to be gathered at the beginning of the harvest.
In conclusion, Those who homesteaded in the West generally had a positive experience, with most families reporting high levels of contentment, good health, and abundant harvests.
Read more about harvests
brainly.com/question/1925330
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is:<span>the government can change real output </span> <span>only by making unexpected changes in aggregate demand.
Without making the unexpected changes, the market would most likely anticipate the movement of market equilibrium and adjust that output to obtain maximum profit. Because of this, the government has to utilize the element of surprise that prevent the people on the market to create their adjustment</span>
