Answer: specific deterrence
Explanation:
What is specific deterrence ?
Specific deterrence refers to the punishment given to someone who has committed a particular offence in order to ensure that they don't commit it again in the future.
The purpose of this policy is to discourage the person from thinking about committing an act against the law again.
It ranges from fines to spending a particular sentence in jail.
Trevor has spent a jail sentence of ten years and because of this experience he came back with a changed mind .
He is now determined to never break the law again because he doesn't want to receive the punishment again which will put him the same terrible experience all over again.
Specific deterrence has taken its effect on him.
Answer:
E
Explanation:
The power of the President to refuse to approve a bill or joint resolution and thus prevent its enactment into law is the veto. ... This veto can be overridden only by a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House. If this occurs, the bill becomes law over the President's objections.
In Oliver Twist, Dickens did not try to sugar coat the criminal world. He described this world frankly.
This was clear in his <span>"to show [criminals] as they really are forever skulking uneasily through the dirtiest paths of life...would be a service to society."
Dickens believed that by showing the real picture of the criminal world as it is (realism), the society would be inspired and motivated to find effective solutions to solve this problem.</span>
At the time, the government was considered to be democratic, the only federalist officers were the judges. In marbury v Madison the judge, was a federalist (Judge Marshall). What happened was Jefferson order the Secretary of state to not deliver commissions to federalist judges. Marybury sued for commissions, which created the case. What was significant was Marshall used the judiciary act to rule Marbury had commission, but it gave the court grater power than the constitution make the act unconstitutional. Marbury lost the case but the federalist judges won in the end. This case created Judicial review which let the supreme court exercise the power to decide weather an act of congress was allowed by the constitution. This gave the judges more power
