18+ and you work 35+ hours per week to learn.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer: B. Front and Back regions
Explanation: The use of different media accounts by Maria is used to demarcate front and back regions. It is usually used to explain the principle of social interaction, showcasing the differences in the attitude of an individual or person in the environment due to time, place or audience.
The front region could be explained as that part of a person which is visible to others and as such Maria tends to shape her attitude and portray a good image in the presence of her employer and professors.
However, In the back region, Maria will feel more relaxed and devoid of pressure to impress her employers or professors. In this region Maria wants to have fun and not act in other to please anyone.
Answer:it might be either c or a not sure tho
Explanation:
<span>The term occupational prestige describes the public perception of an individual’s social standing based on their professional position. The</span><span> Harris poll found that </span>occupational prestige is linked to the position’s effect on societal welfare and indicates that <span>teachers, firefighters and scientists </span>rank among the highest prestige professions.
