Answer:
5.71%
Explanation:
The after tax cost of debt=pretax cost of debt*(1-t)
where t is the tax rate of 35% or 0.35
pretax cost of debt=yield to maturity
The yield to maturity can be determined using rate formula in excel as below:
=rate(nper,pmt,-pv,fv)
nper is the number of coupon interest payable by the bonds i.e 12 coupons in 12 years
pmt is the annual coupon=$1000*9.5%=$95
pv is the current market price-flotation cost=$1,100-$48=$1052
fv is the face value of $1000
=rate(12,95,-1052,1000)=8.78%
After tax cost of debt=8.78%
*(1-0.35)=5.71%
Answer:
d.) Ethics are the standard of what is right and wrong, and they are based on our values. Being ethical requires a moral judgement, and that's not always easy. Ethical behavior takes courage and has to be practiced.
Answer:
-jerry is entitled to monetary damages compensations due to a contract breach.
-Freddy has to pay Jerry $90
Explanation:
the damage that the gym is entitled to would be that of a contract breach. Freddy wanted to earn more money so he breached the contract. Now given that Jerry had to go with another supplier of water at a greater cost of 50 dollars for 9 months, just to satisfy his requirements. Freddy has to pay him monetary damages for this breach in contract. he has to pay the difference that exists between the price in the contract they had and what jerry now has to pay due to the breach. The difference is 10 dollars, which is to be paid every month for 9 months
= (50 - 40)*9
= 10 * 9 = $90
Answer:
Yes because Marco discriminated by ignoring the email due to its appearance of being linked to someone of a different national origin
Explanation:
Real estate agents are not allowed to discriminate against buyers of property. Of they do they can lose their Liscence.
Discrimination is the act of behaving differently
and withholding benefits from people based on their race, colour, religion, sex, or gender.
In this scenario Marco ignores communicating with one of his clients because the email address has a last name in it that appears to be Irish.
He did not consider the application at all resulting in the client losing the opportunity to obtain the new condo.
As a result of this discriminatory action Marco stands the risk of losing his liscence
