It would prevent harm to others should intervene in the conduct of an individual. Hence, option B is correct.
<h3>What is
principle of harm?</h3>
The damage principle holds that people should be free to act however they like as long as they don't cause harm to others. It was first proposed by English philosopher John Stuart Mill and is a cornerstone of the liberal political theory.
John Stuart Mill's essay "On Liberty". The idea that the right to self-determination is not unrestricted is expressed in the "harm principle," which Mill coined.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about principle of harm, click here:
brainly.com/question/14618598
#SPJ4
The options are missing in the question-
a. any of the listed conditions is true.
b. it would prevent harm to others.
c. it is not in the interest of that individual.
d. it would clearly be to the benefit of the individual.
Answer:
i'm good for now. thanks tho.
Explanation:
have a good day
:)
Answer:
A citizens of Britain
Explanation:
think of the tea party lol
Answer: Culture war
Explanation:
Culture war is defined as the dispute that occurs between two or more social communities.This conflict is regarding proving and implementation one's belief, culture, customs or values superior in society .Conflict topics are related with latest society disagreement subjects usually.
According to the question, dispute between both the political parties is displaying cultural war in which they are having dispute upon reformation balance budget and health related field. Both the parties are assuming their agenda to be more prominent and superior.