Answer:
D.An ever-changing system of rules and laws
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Answer:
The oceanic crust would sink below the continental crust.
Explanation:
The Oceanic Crust is thicker than continental crust. The Oceanic crust is made with volcanic rocks. As both having differences in the density when active continental crust meets oceanic crust in subduction zones, the oceanic crust is typically pushed back into the mantle.
Answer:
Strengthened the position of big business
Explanation:
The Supreme Court's decisions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were aimed at strengthening trade and establishing large national corporations. For this reason, they focused on establishing economic policies that would raise the creation of new businesses, in addition to strengthening the position of those that already exist.