Compare: both stones
contrast: one was broken, one has words, one is a picture
Answer:
A correlation is only a mathematical means of describing the relationship between variables. When it is a positive correlation, it means when the value of one increases, for example, the value of the other variable also increases or when one decreases, so does the other. A negative correlation would show that as one variable increases in value, the other decreases. These relationships are non-causal as you're not manipulating variables to control them to see what is causing this relationship. Sometimes, non-causal covariance (or variables that don't have an effect on each other vary cooincidentally in a pattern-like fashion, when there is actually another variable causing the relationship going on.
Explanation:
In the case of this example, it is doubtful that having money causes you to have a higher grade point average. So while we see an increase in grade point average with those who have high income it could be due to other factors, like people with more money have access to learning tools, tutors and other things that people with less money don't have access to. So it is access to tools, not money that is actually causing a difference. There are likely dozens if not hundreds of other potential confounded variables that could be causing this observation.
Answer:
a. A government which works to protect society from violence and crime.
Explanation:
Social order in a society is a situation in which the citizens of a nation come to a consensus on certain standards, codes of conduct, and values that must be obeyed by all individuals. Failure to adhere to these standards translates into a contravention of the laws of the land which in turn is a breakdown of order, the result of which is often detrimental.
Violence and Crime are acts that can lead to unrest and the absence of order in the society. Therefore, when the government of the land works to protect society from violence and crime, they are trying to preserve and maintain order.
If elected to an executive position: would choose a fully technical team with ministers or secretaries who actually had expertise in their respective portfolios. People I had confidence in who could actually show results in different areas of government action. It would broaden the channels of popular participation, involve the population in government decisions. I would establish a management plan with goals to address the main issues of the place I was governing. And I would be very careful about the alliances I would make. I would not make alliances with the corrupt no matter what it cost. My biggest goal would be to finish the term with nothing to be ashamed of and very proud of.
Ageism and sexism exist in the family as well, while bigotry is coordinated towards individuals outside it. Individuals who you may never meet by any means, contingent upon what nation you and they live in.
Many ladies' suffrage activists were insulted when the fifteenth amendment turned out and the nineteenth amendment hadn't. The way that white men esteemed their own particular spouses short of what they esteemed their slaves. So there unquestionably is the inside the-family viewpoint.
