1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudik [331]
3 years ago
13

To divide 14 2/3 divide by 2 3/4, Erik multiplied 14 2/3 times 4/3. Explain Erik's error.

Mathematics
1 answer:
nignag [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Erik should have divided 14 2/3 by 2 3/4, but instead he multiplied causing him to have a greater answer than 5 and 1/3

(give brainliest please)

You might be interested in
Help me pwees no links<br><br> what is 159 rounded to the nearest tenth minus 10
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

150

Step-by-step explanation:

159 rounded to the nearest tenth is 160

160-10=150

8 0
3 years ago
When an electronics company produces 1000 chips, it makes a profit of $10 per unit. When it produces 5000 chips, the company mak
adell [148]
I would be -198 your welcome :)

6 0
2 years ago
Please help me with this
xenn [34]

Step-by-step explanation:

based on my understanding of the dreidel, this is a regular spinner with 4 equal sides (but different symbols on them, so, we can clearly distinguish between the possible 4 different outcomes).

in other words, this resembles a die with only 4 sides and therefore only 4 equally probable outcomes.

and therefore, the probability to get the specified symbol in 1 attempt is indeed 1/4.

remember, a probability is always desired cases over totally possible cases.

and here, we have one desired outcome out of 4 possible outcomes. hence the probability of 1/4.

now, we are spinning the dreidel twice.

that means we have now 4×4 = 16 possible outcomes.

but we only want the outcomes, where the specified symbol is showing exactly once - either after the first spin or after the second spin.

so, out of the 16 possible combinations, we want only the ones, where the first spin delivered that result :

1 option on the first spin and 3 options (4 minus the already delivered result) on the second spin : 1×3 = 3.

and the ones, where the second spin delivered the result (but not the first). so, we have 3×1 = 3 options there.

that means we have 6 desired cases out of total 16 possible outcomes, and the probability is

6/16 = 3/8

mathematically we would simply say that the probability is the sum of

the probability of spinning it first combined with the probability of not spinning it second.

the probability of not spinning it first combined with the probability to spin it second.

that is

1/4 × 3/4 = 3/16

+

3/4 × 1/4 = 3/16

-----------------------

6/16 = 3/8

I don't know the options you can select, but I hope you understand the principles I explained. and I gave you the result and the way to calculate it.

so, hopefully you find the fitting options.

8 0
2 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%20%7B%205%20x%20%5E%20%7B%202%20%7D%20-%2029%20x%20-%206%20%7D%20%7B%203%20x%20%5E%20%
olganol [36]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Vertical Asymptote: x=2Horizontal Asymptote: NoneEquation of the Slant/Oblique Asymptote: y=x 3+23 Explanation:Given:y=f(x)=x2−93x−6Step.1:To find the Vertical Asymptote:a. Factor where possibleb. Cancel common factors, if anyc. Set Denominator = 0We will start following the steps:Consider:y=f(x)=x2−93x−6We will factor where possible:y=f(x)=(x+3)(x−3)3x−6If there are any common factors in the numerator and the denominator, we can cancel them.But, we do not have any.Hence, we will move on.Next, we set the denominator to zero.(3x−6)=0Add 6 to both sides.(3x−6+6)=0+6(3x−6+6)=0+6⇒3x=6⇒x=63=2Hence, our Vertical Asymptote is at x=2Refer to the graph below:enter image source hereStep.2:To find the Horizontal Asymptote:Consider:y=f(x)=x2−93x−6Since the highest degree of the numerator is greater than the highest degree of the denominator,Horizontal Asymptote DOES NOT EXISTStep.3:To find the Slant/Oblique Asymptote:Consider:y=f(x)=x2−93x−6Since, the highest degree of the numerator is one more than the highest degree of the denominator, we do have a Slant/Oblique AsymptoteWe will now perform the Polynomial Long Division usingy=f(x)=x2−93x−6enter image source hereHence, the Result of our Long Polynomial Division isx3+23+(−53x−6)

4 0
2 years ago
What is 35% of 60? I need it for studying
seraphim [82]
35% of 60 is 21. Hope this helped!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help. Find the first 4 terms in a sequence using the recursive definition.
    10·1 answer
  • E is 5 more than d.<br> fis 7 less than d.<br> a) Write an expression for e in terms of d.
    14·2 answers
  • #5 Antonio and Abby had the same nimber of paperclips. After Antonio gave 30 paperclips to Abby, Abby had twice as many papercli
    7·1 answer
  • An artist used silver wire to make a square that has a perimeter of 40 inches. She then used copper wire to make the largest cir
    14·1 answer
  • Please help I will give brianliest to correct answerer serious answers only
    6·2 answers
  • Mechanika
    7·2 answers
  • Part A: A graph passes through the points (0, 2), (2, 6), and (3, 12). Does this graph represent a linear function or a non-line
    13·2 answers
  • Solve for x please. I need step-by-step explanation. Thank you. ​
    10·1 answer
  • Solve for x √4x-3=5 check extraneous or not​
    12·1 answer
  • Alfonso wants to buy a $500 Series EE savings bond. How
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!