Answer:
Either you quit trying and lose $800 sunk, or you spend $800 for $1,600 total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600. That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Explanation:
Since $800 has been spent which means Spending up to an additional $1,000 is still reasonable, but a condition in which you know that the deal will definitely go through.
Secondly since you have already sunk $800, and you know that spending an additional $800 would guarantee it, you can do one among this two options which are either you stop trying and lose the $800 sunk, or you the spend $800 for $1,600($1,000+$600) total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600($1,000-$800=200,$800-$200=$600). That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
There is no data given in the question, a similar question is attached with this answer and answer was made accordingly.
Comparative Statement is made in the MS Excel File which is attached with this answer, Please find it.
Explanation:
a.
All the items except the president salary are relevant to the segment A, because these costs are particularly for incurred for Seg. A. A a single unit the Segment A is making the profit of $11,000. Allocation of president salary is the major reason for the loss.
b.
Keeping Segment A makes is a more profitable decision than Eliminating the segment A. because share of president salary associated with segment A is allocated to other segments and Segment A was contributing $11,000 in  the president salary at break-even. This contribution is lost when we Eliminate the Segment A.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: Rehabilitation 
Explanation: Because your trying to get the person off the alcohol - not a great explanation but yea. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
A product that is in a high-growth market but has a low market share would be classified as a question mark on the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix.
Question marks consume huge amounts of money but they do not generate a lot of cash.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
D. 3.6
Explanation:
The effective gross income multiplier (EGIM) is the ratio between the sale price (SP) and the effective growth income (EGI)

Sales Price (SP) = $950,000
Potential gross income (PI) = $250,000
Vacancy and collection losses (VC)= 15% = 0.15 * $250,000 = $37,500
Miscellaneous income (M) =  $50,000.
The effective growth income is given by:

Thus, the effective gross income multiplier is:
